The article Orthopaedists' and family practitioners' knowledge of simple acute low back pain management is both informative and a great example of why one can go terribly awry simply reading an article abstract and worse yet, only the abstract conclusion. In this case, the primary abstract conclusion was: “Both orthopaedic surgeons’ and family
physicians’ knowledge of treating LBP is deficient. Orthopedic surgeons are less aware of current treatment than family practitioners……”. This would elicit a “Tell me something I don’t already know” response from readers of this blog in many cases. However, when you read further you realize that this article doesn’t really provide an answer to that question.
The researchers determined knowledge deficiency in these two groups of doctors (253 orthopedists and 140 FPs) via responses to a questionnaire at their professional conferences (apparently in Israel). The 5 questions related to: 1. use of medication (paracetomol or standard NSAID vs COX-2 meds); 2. Effectiveness of bed rest; 3. Effectiveness of encouragement and advice; 4. Effectiveness of manipulation; and 5. Need for imaging studies. Physical therapy was also listed (whatever that means or includes) but was not analyzed due to conflicting recommendations.
Results? Back then, if a patient saw an Orthopod they were going to receive a lot more COX-2 Meds, X-rays, bed-rest and less encouragement than that would from a family practice doc. Interestingly, more than half of both Orthopods and FPs viewed manipulation as appropriate but that was graded as an inappropriate response by the researchers. Physical therapy: well, what’s that? (ok, we can’t figure it our either so let’ not count that answer.)
A few things to consider: The answers were based on a 2001 Clinical Practice Guideline, the questionnaire was administered in 2005 and this article was published in 2009 (probably not exactly the best data to give us a current understanding of how these two physician groups view and manage patients with LBP).
However, there is plenty of evidence to suggest that imaging, meds and in some cases bed-rest are still frequently used. I do wonder if their perspective on the use of manipulation for acute or chronic LBP is still moderate (51% and 57% for orthopods and FP’s, respectively) or if it has increased, given the recommendations in current US and UK clinical practice guidelines. My own guess is that things haven’t changed much (except spinal surgery, especially fusion and increasingly disc replacement may now be popular, albeit ill-supported choices). How about yours?
Perhaps our patients should see a EBP physical therapist instead.
Rob